The other day I was reading an
online article about solar and wind energy for residential units. One of the
criticisms the article presented was that energy producing technologies at a
residential scale won’t solve large-scale energy problems. Large solar or wind plants
are needed if one wants to use green energy to solve any kind of large-scale
problem. The author then went on to counter-point by asking the question why
not the small-scale, local model? What if energy wasn’t produced at a large,
centralized location, but instead it was produced at a small, more localized
level on a widespread scale? Why can’t the building itself produce its own
energy?
Traditionally, buildings constitute
40% of the energy consumption in the U.S. and E.U. There has been a push in the
architectural community to reduce this percentage. Net zero or near zero
buildings are gaining in popularity and importance for this very reason. Net
zero or near zero buildings produce as much energy as they consume. This can be
achieved through a combination of energy efficient building systems
(geo-thermal and lighting selection), building envelopes (ICF and low-e
glazing), building orientation (natural ventilation and shading), and energy producing
systems (solar panels and wind turbines).
Net zero buildings don’t have to
be fully autonomous. These buildings can still be hooked to the grid. During
times of low energy demand, the building can run off its own energy production.
If the building is producing more energy than needed, excess energy can be fed
back into the grid. During times of high energy demand or low energy
production, the building could then draw from the grid as needed.
The idea of having a local,
decentralized source of power for buildings may seem far off, but the
technology to do this exists right now. Maybe not every building produces its
own power. What if different neighborhoods had their own individual power
sources? A system like this would be more secure when there are power failures
due to intense storms and blackouts. One could also have individual
neighborhoods experimenting with new technologies and different systems
combinations. What if the neighborhood elementary school became a power
contributor?
Here is a diagram of a net zero home. These same concepts can apply to educational facilities. Image courtesy of http://blog.builddirect.com/greenbuilding/net-zero-home-building/. You can also find more information on net zero homes here.
|
Great post! Leave it to the architects to integrate net zero design techniques into future buildings and houses.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what it will take for us to reach this level of energy sustainability over the next few decades? I think it'd be nice to see more government support in terms of offering incentives to those who use sustainable energy technologies (i.e. solar panels, wind turbines), but more than anything I believe we need to change our culture of consumption.
If we can understand and come to terms with the effect our consumption has on the state of our environment and the potentially grim future that awaits us, then I believe we will put our "comfortable" lifestyle aside and do what's necessary to sustain ourselves. I think we're beginning to move in the right direction, and I'm hopeful that net zero buildings will soon become a optimal choice for us all.
A. Lu
Kansas State U.