One of the intriguing and interesting ways to build sustainably is to use the practice of daylight harvesting or “daylighting” to light a building. As long as there have been windows, daylight has been used to light buildings, but in the era of (relatively inexpensive) electricity, good design practices went out the window, so to speak, and little attention was paid to this aspect of building design. Window placement was then determined based on what the designer was trying to do with the building’s façade, and in many cases, particularly in the 1980’s, it was fashionable to design buildings (particularly schools) without windows as it was considered to be “too distracting” to have windows. LEED has a credit for daylighting – IEQ credit 8.1.
Knowing what we know about human health, hormone production, circadian rhythms, and the various colors and intensities of daylight at different times of the year, one can assume that daylighting is important in human health, therefore in student learning.
Studies show some interesting benefits associated with the use of daylighting. Studies show students in daylit schools experience 3.2 to 3.8 fewer absent days. Studies also show students achieving higher test scores. Fewer dental caries and increased student growth are another correlation between daylighting and student health. In addition, students in daylit schools show better attention spans and better work habits. Schools also report teachers having fewer sick days when teaching in daylit schools. These are a few of the more well-known studies available on this high-performance building strategy.
Daylit buildings also offer substantial cost savings by reducing energy use. Since electrical lighting heats buildings, when lights are turned off cooling loads go down. Since commercial buildings use more cooling, on average, in the course of a year than heating (due in part to lighting, computer and human heat generation), turning off the lights realizes an immediate benefit for both lighting and mechanical systems. A second benefit is that of reduced electrical lighting, which will decrease utility bills. A third benefit of daylighting occurs when the use of HVAC is reduced; then HVAC noise is reduced. (Noise is a big issue in schools and is associated with difficulty in student learning.)
There is no one single successful strategy in the use of daylighting to achieve LEED credit 8.1. Windows should be strategically placed to provide light but not glare. Light should be bounced into areas further away from windows by the use of light shelves and/or reflective surfaces. Other methods are to use clerestory windows or skylights (skylights should be used with caution in areas prone to severe hailstorms). The use of sunshades will reduce glare while providing natural daylight. Interior lighting controls need to be used in order to maximize daylight harvesting. Use building modeling (LEED prerequisite) to determine an overall strategy for successful daylight harvesting. The use of daylight harvesting will create significant cost savings for the building owner and improved outcomes for students.
Student outcomes: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy00osti/28049.pdf
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (research conducted by the Heschong Mahone Group, Fair Oaks, CA), Daylighting in Schools: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Daylighting and Human and Performance, 1999.
Energy usage: http://www.lightnowblog.com/2009/01/study-captures-daylightings-hvac-and-lighting-energy-savings-impacts/
Daylight harvesting strategies: http://www.inive.org/members_area/medias/pdf/Inive%5CIBPSA%5CBS05_0501_508.pdf
This is a very interesting article. I would not say the 3.2 to 3.8 fewer absent days is really big enough of an increase to get excited about. I would also like to see the data on scores. Was that TAKS scores or class average scores? I do like the idea. I would hate a classroom with out windows.
ReplyDeleteCGibbs(TSU)
I wonder who ever thought that windowless environments are healthy for anyone, especially children. That was definitely a bandwagon schools should have never climbed on. It doesn't take science to know this defies common sense. Multiple studies show that students perform better in daylit classrooms and reap health benefits as well. Recent studies show that daylighting in schools may significantly increase students’ test scores and promote better health and physical development and that these benefits can be attained without an increase in school construction or maintenance costs.
ReplyDeleteOne interesting study was done in Sweden. Researchers tracked ninety elementary school students over the course of year in four classrooms with varying daylighting levels. They studied their behavior, health, and cortisol (stress hormone) levels. Their findings show that classrooms without natural light may upset the basic hormone pattern, and this in turn may influence a child's ability to concentrate or cooperate. It may eventually have an impact on annual body growth and absenteeism. (C. Scott--TSU)
This confirms what I have always thought and believed, more windows will make everybody happy! Honestly I am very lucky as I have a window myself and I would be heartbroken to have to teach in a classroom with out. But I wonder if the fewer students absences would be a cost saving measure as it would mean more general funding based on the student population at the school.
ReplyDeleteM. Nelson (TSU)
I find this to a very interesting post. On one hand, I completely agree that daylit schools will result in better learning and lower energy costs. However, I am very skeptical that the correlations made are truly based on having natural light in schools. While daylit rooms may provide for fewer sick days and better overall student health/test scores, I feel as though that may have more to do with the psychological feeling of being in sunlight than dimly lit closed rooms. Again, I agree that daylit rooms are a much better environment for learning, I'm just a little unsure on the correlations credited here.
ReplyDeleteI have been in both settings, not windows and natural lighting. I prefer the natural light compared to the cavelike atmosphere of a windowless room. I am not sure if it had an effect on the first grades tudents or not, but I can attest that it did have an impact on me. Think about all of the homes that have all the beautiful windows that remain closed and covered all of the time. Some people prefer the feeling of a cohesive closed space. I think there can be something to the fact that natural light does make people feel better and have more energy.
ReplyDeleteB.Irick (TSU)
I have taught in both settings and I can say that having windows in the room definitely has a different feel and effect on student learning in the classroom. In my current room, I am upstairs and although our windows just overlook the roof, we like to open the windows and allow the air to come through as well. I have noticed the students pay more attention and they love sitting back close to the windows.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree that daylight plays a part on students' attitudes, health, and attention span. I think when you are in a dark lit room it makes you feel more sleepy and less focused. Our offices are located in the basement so we never see any type of natural sunlight. I have personally experienced more of a negative mood since being down there for nearly four years. We have brought in natural lamps and a few plants just to brighten things up. So I can see how the lack of daylight could cause students to be absent more often and be more distracted. Overall, I just think daylight naturally makes you more happy. Besides, building classrooms with more light can also be a cost reducing measure. S. Ellason (TSU)
ReplyDeleteI agree with C.Heimall. I think it will make for a happy room, but I really fail to see the correlation in the day light and scores. Kids will give you what they want on any given day.
ReplyDeleteCGibbs(TSU)
Daylight and sunlight clearly affect attitudes and moods. The amount of depression and alcoholism in the remote northern areas of the planet, like Alaska, where the sun isn't seen or is rarely seen in the winter months, attests to this fact. The positive affect daylight has is hard to dispute; related is the fact that positive attitudes affect performance. I believe the benefit of naturally lighting a building is great. The difficulty is that the price of heating and cooling is affected. We want the sunlight to come in as much as possible in winter months to help heat the building and don't want the sunlight to come in during the summer months because it heats the building up too much. Disiduous trees can help with this problem; they allow sunlight to get to the building in winter months and block the sunlight in summer months.
ReplyDeleteOne thing that I have noticed personally is that light makes me feel better especially since it gives us vitamin D and a dose of melatonin. I know from working with my students that their behaviors are different in rooms with windows compared to rooms without windows. I know one thing that I have considered if I were to have a charter school would be the open concept with an emphasis on daylighting.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the interesting comments. There are several issues with daylight that EMoore has touched on,humans need daylight - we're solar powered - and we need vitamin D. Increased research into vitamin D shows that it works almost as a hormone in human health and most of us are vitamin D deficient. Circadian rhythms are dependent upon daylight, and there are many studies showing correlations between night shift workers and many physical, emotional, and psychological issues. Depression is linked to a lack of daylight. There are other studies showing correlation between ADHD and lack of daylight in classrooms. Look for replicability/replication in studies. I cited only three studies but there are many more studies, across the board daylight is shown to have positive benefits in the classroom. You would have to look at how each study was designed, but look for double-blind if you want to look further. School administrators get excited about 3.2-3.8 fewer sick days, that is a significant amount of money to a school district as they receive funding based on "kids in seats".
ReplyDeleteI have watched several videos of newly built schools who really made a conscious effort to utilize or harvest natural light. The placement of the windows to let in light indirectly and the ability to bounce the light in ways that don't distract or glare was very interesting. An architect with this expertise would be an asset to an engineering firm.
ReplyDeleteB. Irick (TSU)
My school building has different layouts as the floors rise. Some classroom are very dark and hot during the winter (due to the heat), with little room for ventilation. While other rooms are very nicely lighted. I could not picture myself teaching in a room with limited window and air flow. It plays a role in classroom environment and definitely affects students as well.
ReplyDelete